It Is All About BTC, LTC, ETH, DOGE, KAS mining as well as other alternative crypto currencies
There is a new miner for Nvidia CUDA GPUs available for mining Zcash (ZEC) promising a slightly faster hashrate than the currently fastest implementation of the NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA miner. The most important thing about this new miner is that it is not limited to only mining on NiceHash, so even with the same speed it is still a nice thing to have as it supports Stratum mining on other mining pools besides NiceHash (it does seem to support NiceHash’s Extranonce Subscribe as well). According to the author of the miner it is designed for Nvidia Pascal GPUs, but should work on older Compute 3.0 or higher Nvidia GPUs with at least 1 GB of video memory. Do note that the miner is not open source and there is only a Windows 64-bit binary release available at the moment, it does not seem to be based on other popular codebase and is not being reported as malicious software by antivirus products. You might still want to have something in mind as the user that posted it on Bitcointalk is a new account and not an established miner developer, even though it seems that the miner does work pretty well.
The EWBF CUDA Zcash Miner has a built-in developer fee that is set at 2%, meaning that every 10 minutes the software will switch to a different pool and mine for the developer some shares and then get back to mining for you. The author of the software claims speeds of about 250 H/s for Nvidia GTX 1070 while the NiceHash EQM miner does currently about 220 H/s on the same GPU. Our quick tests showed a hashrate of about 235-240 H/s average (up to 250 H/s) on stock GTX 1070, so still slightly faster, but not as much as you may want it to… then there is the dev fee as well and it seems that we are seeing somewhat more rejects than, especially when switching to mine for the dev fee. So while this may be an interesting alternative for users willing to mine outside of NiceHash, the actual performance that you may get poolside may not be much different than with what is currently the fastest implementation from NiceHash (taking into account the dev fee and the rejected shares)…
– For more information about the new faster EWBF CUDA Zcash Miner for Nvidia GPUs…
15 Responses to New Faster EWBF CUDA Zcash Miner for Nvidia GPUs
PCUSer
December 7th, 2016 at 18:27
750Ti = 52
GTX960 = 106
GTX970 = 177
Yay!!!
lyolyalya
December 7th, 2016 at 21:59
no reject with coinmine at all=)works on 660 ti – 46-47 sols. 1070 – 275-280 sols OC.and it’s workin with pools!much more profit to come=)
Miner
December 8th, 2016 at 01:41
Best pool works for me on http://zec.suprnova.cc no rejects full speed
Pet
December 8th, 2016 at 10:04
GTX 1060 = 175
Javi
December 8th, 2016 at 13:58
1070 G1 Gigabyte (no OC).. 240 sol/s
Marcin Grygiel
December 8th, 2016 at 14:36
Zotac GTX 1070 AMP – 275 Sols/s
Mario
December 12th, 2016 at 13:17
I have changed my graphic card with Radeon and now again Nvidia is rising…. :'(. No hope for all of this….
Mike
December 12th, 2016 at 23:30
Mario,
Hate to make it worse but new NHM EQ miner gets 336 SOL/sec on overclocked 1070 :)
zidi
December 13th, 2016 at 10:18
asus GTX 1080- 267 sol
Lankyman
February 7th, 2017 at 09:43
Does this look normal for the card i have?
+———————————+
| EWBF’s Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b |
+———————————+
INFO: Target: 0080000000000000…
INFO: Detected new work: 58770#493
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 650, 1024 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 3
INFO 09:39:25: GPU0 Accepted share 234ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 09:39:29: GPU0 Accepted share 234ms [A:2, R:0]
GPU0: 18 Sol/s
Total speed: 18 Sol/s
GPU0: 17 Sol/s
Total speed: 17 Sol/s
INFO 09:40:18: GPU0 Accepted share 234ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:40:24: GPU0 Accepted share 234ms [A:4, R:0]
I would love to buy a new Nvidia GTX1050 or Radeon RX460 ?
Please can somebody suggest?
Do i have hope in mining with those cards for a few dollars a week?
if it was say 5 dollars a week? not even sure if it is worth it .
Rufus
April 4th, 2017 at 19:15
i have a Gigabyte 1060 6gb its pretty amazing
+————————————————-+
| EWBF’s Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.3b |
+————————————————-+
INFO: Server: zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3335
INFO: Solver Auto.
INFO: Devices: User defined.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Disabled
—————————————————
INFO: Target: 000ffffe00000000…
INFO: Detected new work: 17040416c2
INFO: Target: 000ffffe00000000…
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6144 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0
INFO 17:38:05: GPU0 Accepted share 327ms [A:1, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 71C
GPU0: 314 Sol/s
Total speed: 314 Sol/s
INFO 17:38:23: GPU0 Accepted share 224ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 17:38:33: GPU0 Accepted share 627ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 17:38:35: GPU0 Accepted share 115ms [A:4, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 72C
GPU0: 313 Sol/s
Total speed: 313 Sol/s
INFO 17:38:59: GPU0 Accepted share 124ms [A:5, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 72C
GPU0: 315 Sol/s
Total speed: 315 Sol/s
INFO 17:39:15: GPU0 Accepted share 694ms [A:6, R:0]
INFO 17:39:25: GPU0 Accepted share 116ms [A:7, R:0]
Konsta
June 11th, 2017 at 13:34
Pretty weird that people get only 200-240 sol/s, because I get 400-500 (sometimes peaking at 700) with my Asus Strix 1070)
Stefan
June 18th, 2017 at 03:17
I have a Kfa2 GTX 1060 6GB OC at +225Core; +700mem
Here are my stats:
+————————————————-+
| EWBF’s Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b |
+————————————————-+
INFO: Current pool: europe.zcash.miningpoolhub.com:20570
INFO: Selected pools: 1
INFO: Solver: Auto.
INFO: Devices: All.
INFO: Temperature limit: 85
INFO: Api: Disabled
—————————————————
INFO: Target: 0004000000000000…
INFO: Detected new work: 3410
INFO: Target: 000b4305bb2b8b34…
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6144 MB i:64
INFO: Detected new work: 3411
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0
INFO: Detected new work: 3412
INFO 02:15:37: GPU0 Accepted share 23ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 02:15:40: GPU0 Accepted share 23ms [A:2, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 55C
GPU0: 319 Sol/s
Total speed: 319 Sol/s
INFO 02:15:54: GPU0 Accepted share 25ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 02:15:54: GPU0 Accepted share 22ms [A:4, R:0]
INFO: Detected new work: 3413
INFO 02:16:08: GPU0 Accepted share 23ms [A:5, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 58C
GPU0: 313 Sol/s
Total speed: 313 Sol/s
HOWEVER: I am a little bit unnerved by virustotal.com findings:
zec miner 0.3.4b\0.3.4b\miner.exe:
Verified: Unsigned
Link date: 20:30 11.06.2017
Publisher: n/a
Company: n/a
Description: n/a
Product: n/a
Prod version: n/a
File version: n/a
MachineType: 64-bit
MD5: 4DB0C33744BDC72FDF35ECC5F0297010
SHA1: 6A3B664EAF9AD476467B04ED3A04F10226DF1E54
PESHA1: E6236CD795FAD6239DF93107D784921357BB6427
PE256: 9A8194DCEBCE7F72687D84922721FACB3A07C4565AD78D202E52115F95B20B38
SHA256: 84DD02DEBBF2B0C5ED7EEBF813305543265E34EC98635139787BF8B882E7C7B4
IMP: D92107AAC696CEC8C3688D75A6F497EC
VT detection: 15/61
VT link: https://www.virustotal.com/file/84dd02debbf2b0c5ed7eebf813305543265e34ec98635139787bf8b882e7c7b4/analysis/
What do you think?
kraken9911
January 23rd, 2018 at 04:12
I’ve done a search here and no one is talking about Bminer a new Equihash miner released last month.
I started with EBWF then I discovered DSTM which was the tits with the higher hashrate but it was fairly unstable if I tried to adjust the vid cards through MSI AB giving me hard freezes or bsods. Sometimes they happened a short while after I walked away after adjusting a setting to give it time to settle. Sometimes hours later.
I saw this post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2519271.320
and tried it out.
Using the exact same stable msi AB settings I dialed in with DSTM, I tried it out for 24 hours and didn’t get a single crash and rejected shares were single digits out of almost 3k shares submitted and my overall hashrate went up +60 sol/s. I’ve also noticed it doesn’t mind when I’m tuning the graphics cards while active and have never gotten a bsod or frozen pc in days now. Cherry on top is that I personally like the telemetry screen which is a bit nicer to monitor over dstm’s. Devfee is the standard 2% same as all the others.
Just wanted to share because I know we’re all trying to find that razor’s edge of performance in our rigs.
check my posts in reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/7q9807/ive_done_a_search_here_and_no_one_is_talking/
lyc458216
March 9th, 2018 at 05:25
I set –intensity value be 32(allowed value is 1-64),so i think my gpu load should be 50%,but it is still 100%.I don’t know why. And i want to reduce my gpu load,what should i do,thank you.