We continue our series of tests of the new Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition (reference design) for crypto currency mining after yesterday we have checked the situation for mining Ethereum with the new Pascal GPUs and have seen the not so great results. Ethereum and the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm it uses is still doing better on AMD GPUs, but Ehereum mining is set to end at some point with the altcoin switching to PoS only and the forks that use the same algorithm are not yet providing a real alternative. So with the growing difficulty and the switch to PoS at some point in probably less than a year you should also be interested in how the GTX 1080 performs in other new GPU mineable algorithms as well as in the more popular ones that. This is the reason we are now going to compare the GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition with GTX 980 Ti and GTX 970 to see the difference in terms of performance in other algorithms as well. As you will probably see the GTX 1080 does provide a nice performance boost compared to the two other older generation alternatives, but with its currently high price even the power saving does not make it great option for building multi-GPU mining rigs for the moment. The more interestingly priced GTX 1070 will most likely be the better choice for building 6 GPU mining rigs succeeding the GTX 970 as the best Nvidia-based GPU for crypto mining, though we are yet to test the 1070 in order to confirm that.

The ccminer forks we have used for testing:
– Blakecoin (Blake256-8rounds), Decred (Blake256-14rounds), Vcash (Blake256-8rounds) ccminer
– Lyra2REv2 ccminer
– X11evo ccminer
– All other algorithms

Tests were done under Windows 7 with already existing ccMiner releases that are not compiled with CUDA 8.0 and with support for Compute 6.1 that the GTX 1080 uses, though without optimizations specific for GTX 1080 or the Pascal architecture in general we are probably not going to see much of a difference. Anyway, we do have planned to do additional testing comparing the difference in terms of performance with existing ccMiner forks compiled with CUDA 8.0 and Compute 6.1 against the results here achieved with CUDA 6.5/7.5 and Compute 5.2 releases that were tested here.

We had almost problem-free experience testing the above algorithms on the GTX 1080, though there are some things that we need to note. For example the Nist5 default intensity (21?) was crashing the miner, so tested with 20 where it was working fine. The very low Neoscrypt performance on the GTX 1080 is because the algorithm probably needs special optimizations to take advantage of the GPU. The Lyra2RE performance was not that much faster on the GTX 1080 as compared to GTX 980 Ti, so here some optimizations will most likely result in increased performance. Note that we have also tested X11, though now that is has moved to the ASIC phase you probably won’t want to GPU mine it anyway.

What is clearly seen from the comparison above is that the new GTX 1080 performs about twice as fast (on average) than a single GTX 970 and we are using Gigabyte Windoforce 970 OC GPU comparing to stock 980 Ti and GTX 1080. The GTX 1080 uses about the same power as a single GTX 970, but offers twice the performance, but the real issue here is the price at the moment. If the GTX 1080 was about twice the price of GTX 970 it might’ve been an interesting option for miners that are currently using Nvidia GTX 970 mining rigs, but it is unfortunately more like 2.5 and not two times. Comparing the GTX 1080 to the GTX 980 Ti shows an average performance advantage of almost 50% in favor of the GTX 1080, with not that great price difference between the two cards (the GTX 1080 is about 30% more expensive). So definitely no point in going for GTX 980 Ti instead of GTX 1080 for mining, though still both cards are not the best choice for multi-GPU mining rigs, then again if you are buying just a single GPU for gaming and want to also mine with it when not gaming the GTX 1080 might be much more interesting that for use on multi-GPU mining rigs.

• Our Experience Using the CoinKing Multipool Mining Service
• More Testing of the Scryptcc Scrypt Cloud Mining Service
• Voltmoding and Overclocking Even Higher the Gridseed 5-chip ASICs
• Thermal Images of the Voltage Modified Gridseed G-Blade Scrypt ASIC
• Testing the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition for Crypto Mining
• Weekly Report on Our PB Mining Cloud Mining Service Testing
• The New Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Mining Performance
• Review of the 25-28 MHS Silver Fish Blade Scrypt ASIC Miner
• Silencing the iPollo V1 Mini Ethash/ETChash ASIC Miner Among Other Things
• Pushing the Gridseed 5-chip ASICs to the Maximum with a Voltmod
• First Impressions from the Gridseed 5-chip Scrypt Asic
• Storj DriveShare Rewards Report for January
• Using Alcatel TCL A3 and TCL A3X Smartphones for VerusCoin (VRSC) Mining
• Checking Out the NiceHash Service for Selling and Buying Hashrate
• The PBMining Bitcoin Cloud Mining Service is Growing Steadily
• Bit Mining Cloud Mining Service Back Online
• Review of the ZeusMiner Lightning X6 Scrypt ASIC Miner
• Performance of the AMD Radeon RX 480 for Other Algorithms
• Mining Performance of Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
• Thermal Images of the Gridseed 5-chip BTC/LTC Dual Mode ASIC
• What Hashrate to Expect From an Up to Date CPU
• AMD Radeon RX VEGA 64 Benchmarked With NiceHash Miner Legacy
• Updated Guide on How to Mine Both BTC and LTC on Gridseed 5-chip GC3355 ASIC
• Checking Out the Xapo Online Bitcoin Wallet
• How to Easily Overclock Your Bitmain AntMiner Z9 Mini ASIC Miner